EugeneMorozov (User)
Posts: 3
|
| Virtualmin on Debian 3.1 on amd64 arch 2006/12/12 12:51 |
|
|
Hello,
Cannot install virtualmin on Debian 3.1 on amd64 architecture.
The problem is that apt is using architecture string 'amd64' where virutalmin packages are stored on virtualmin server in the binary-x86_64 directory.
Besides it seems that not all packages are present for amd64.
Eugene
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Joe (Admin)
Posts: 4117
|
| Re: Virtualmin on Debian 3.1 on amd64 arch 2006/12/12 13:06 |
|
|
Hey Eugene,
Yep, 64 bit isn't supported yet for Debian. I think I'm gonna wrap up the builds by tonight or tomorrow, though.
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
EugeneMorozov (User)
Posts: 3
|
| Re: Virtualmin on Debian 3.1 on amd64 arch 2006/12/13 05:12 |
|
|
How can I know when it's ready?
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
EugeneMorozov (User)
Posts: 3
|
| Re: Virtualmin on Debian 3.1 on amd64 arch 2006/12/15 06:36 |
|
|
Now I see that amd64 packages are ready. I'm sorry, but I need x86_64, too. I have purchased virtualmin license and can provide details if needed.
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Joe (Admin)
Posts: 4117
|
| Re: Re: Virtualmin on Debian 3.1 on amd64 arch 2006/12/15 12:56 |
|
|
Hey Eugene,
amd64 is what Debian calls x86_64. The two are identical. It's just a misnomer on the part of the Debian folks. I'm running it on an Intel Core 2 Duo as we speak--it is not specific to AMD processors. (And, as far as I know, nobody uses ia64 boxes for hosting. They're too darned expensive.)
Note that it isn't officially supported yet, as I'm still testing and working on the actual install process--I don't know if it will actually work, as is. It'll be ready by this evening. I will announce support on the front page in the News section and in the News forum as soon as it is ready for mass consumption.
Thanks for your patience!
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
